Canadian Payments Association By-law No. 2 — Finance
PROPOSED FEDERAL REGULATION - VIA PART I OF THE GAZETTE
September 3, 2016
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT (This statement is not part of the By-law.) Issues Changes to the Canadian Payments Association By-law No. 2 — Finance (By-law No. 2) are required to give effect to a new funding model adopted by the Canadian Payments Association (CPA) Board of Directors to advance its long-term strategy and plan for the modernization of the Canadian payment clearing and settl... (Click for more)
Published on September 3, 2016
Canadian Payments Association By-law No. 2 — Finance
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT (This statement is not part of the By-law.) Issues Changes to the Canadian Payments Association By-law No. 2 — Finance (By-law No. 2) are required to give effect to a new funding model adopted by the Canadian Payments Association (CPA) Board of Directors to advance its long-term strategy and plan for the modernization of the Canadian payment clearing and settlement system. The current model no longer aligns dues with the value received and is not optimized to support the future direction of the Association. Background The CPA is a statutory body created by the Canadian Payments Act with a mandate to establish and operate national systems for the exchange, clearing, and settlement of payments between banks, credit unions, and other CPA members (115 members currently). Two systems operated by the CPA are the Automated Clearing Settlement System (ACSS) and the Large Value Transfer System (LVTS). In addition to operating these systems, the CPA develops, implements and updates the rules and standards that govern the clearing and settlement of payments exchanged in Canada. The Association operates on a not-for-profit basis, with annual operating and capital expenditure budgets prepared by the Board of Directors and funded by dues paid by its members. The Canadian Payments Act was amended by the Economic Action Plan 2014 Act, No. 2. The amendments established a new governance structure and accountability framework for the CPA, reinforcing the CPA’s mandate to operate in the public interest; meet its statutory obligation to ensure the safety and soundness of CPA systems; and ensure that these systems are efficient and meet the needs of end-users (such as businesses and consumers). Responding to various drivers for change in the broader payments system, the CPA is broadening its attention from the basic operation and maintenance of its current systems, rules and standards, to modernizing the payments infrastructure to meet the longer-term interests of Canadians, the Canadian financial system, and Canada’s economy. The modernization of the Canadian core payments systems is a significant undertaking. The CPA has consulted broadly and retained leading national and international advisors, and has developed a set of working financial models that would help fund the implementation of the modernization project. Due to the fact that almost all the provisions of the current By-law No. 2 would need to be amended in order to give effect to the new financial models and that several other elements were already repealed in previous amendments to the By-law, the current By-law No. 2 would be repealed and replaced by the proposed By-law No. 2. Objectives The objectives behind the repeal and replacement of By-law No. 2 are mainly to Advance the CPA’s modernization initiatives; and Allocate costs equitably and consistently to those who benefit from the CPA’s existing and new services. Description The new CPA By-law No. 2 is designed to generate sufficient funds to cover the fully allocated costs to operate the CPA, enabling the CPA to fund large one-time investments and recover costs in ways that align with the value delivered. Member dues and fees would be equitable and proportional to the value received, with increased flexibility to allow for changes over time. Specifically, increased and adjustable annual dues would be established for all members, and the revised funding model would consist of the following key components: common services dues, replacing the indirect dues threshold; transaction fees, aimed at recouping the costs of operating the particular systems (e.g. LVTS, ACSS); and other service fees (similar to those in the current model). (a) Common services dues The CPA performs services that benefit all members (i.e. “common services”). These common services will continue to expand as the CPA responds to growth and evolution in key areas, including risk management, compliance, policy, rules development, education, and outreach. As the larger CPA members (currently ACSS direct clearers/group clearers and LVTS participants) will continue to realize a greater benefit from the common services than other members, only a portion of the common services costs would be allocated to all members, with the remaining portion being incorporated into the costs covered by transaction fees. The portion of the costs for common services to be applied to all members would be set and reviewed annually by the CPA Board, with adjustments applied as necessary to ensure ongoing alignment with the value received. The CPA has estimated that about 25% of the total common services costs would be recovered through an assessment against all members in the first year of the new By-law No. 2’s implementation. The remaining 75% would be recovered through the transaction fees charged to those who participate directly in the CPA systems (of the current 115 CPA members, 19 participate directly in the LVTS and 11 participate directly in the ACSS). This distribution was determined based on an assessment of the current relative value of common services and a review of comparable jurisdictions. The result is an increased “base price” for membership from $10,000 to the range of $30,000 to $35,000 per member. In the event that common services dues collected exceed the costs of providing the services that are of equal benefit to all members, the excess would be held in a research and development reserve fund, which would be capped at a maximum amount to be determined by the Board. Members would be billed for the common services dues annually. (b) Transaction fees Only entities that participate directly in a system would be charged transaction fees. Currently, the ACSS and the LVTS are the direct services provided by the CPA. The participants who use these services would be charged for transactions cleared through the respective systems (both sent and received). The transaction fees for a particular system would be based on the estimated costs of the Association to operate that system and the estimated number of all transactions by all participants; the estimated value of those transactions; or a combination of both. The estimated costs of operating a system would need to take into account the direct costs to operate the respective system; the portion of the common services costs that is not included in the determination of the common services dues or in the determination of transaction fees for another system; a component for the recovery of capital investment in the system, if applicable; and a fee-stabilizing component to build a reserve to accommodate small variations between (a) projected costs of operating the system and projected transaction volumes and values; and (b) actual costs, volumes and values (capped at a maximum amount as determined by the Board). In deciding which factors to use in the determination of the fee structure for a particular system, the Board would need to consider the nature of that system; the number of participants in that system; and the number and value of transactions by each participant in that system. Transaction fee estimates for the current direct services (which for 2017 are planned to be based on the number of transactions by all participants) indicate that fees for ACSS direct clearers and LVTS participants would be similar to the dues they currently pay under the existing By-law No. 2. For ACSS clearing agents, the volumes cleared by their indirect clearers is small (around 1% of ACSS volumes) and therefore would not have a material impact on their fees. However, ACSS group clearers would pay slightly more than they currently do because their group members (credit union centrals) have relatively significant ACSS clearing volumes (between 3% and 4% of total ACSS volumes) and currently pay more than $10,000 in dues. Under the new approach, the volumes cleared by these centrals would be attributed to the group clearer, resulting in an increase in the group clearer’s volumes. Transaction fees would be billed quarterly, in arrears. (c) Fees for other services The CPA currently assesses fees for other services, such as network and database services, on a cost-recovery basis. These services would continue to be assessed as described in the current By-law No. 2, with flexibility to recover all costs associated with providing the services. “One-for-One” Rule The changes to By-law No. 2 would eliminate some reporting and verification requirements for CPA members. Therefore, the proposed changes would result in a reduction in administrative costs related to those tasks. Currently, indirect members (those members that use the services of a clearing agent or group clearer) are required to report their clearing volumes to the CPA twice a year so that the CPA may calculate their dues. The CPA then follows up with the clearing agents and group clearers, if necessary, to confirm volumes reported and to clarify any discrepancies. This task usually takes one to two days for each clearing agent or group clearer in the ACSS (of which there are currently eight). It would usually take up to one day for indirect members who have clearing volumes through the ACSS (of which there are 74). The ranges reflect the variance in the size of CPA members, where larger members have more complex transaction flows and require more time for compiling and verification. The proposed By-law No. 2 amendments would change the way members of the CPA are invoiced and would eliminate the need for such reporting and confirmation requirements by the CPA. This would lead to a reduction in administrative costs to the affected CPA members. For the purposes of calculating the decrease in administrative cost to CPA members, it was assumed that clearing agents and group clearers would need two days for reporting and confirming volumes, while indirect members would need one day to do so. The analysis assumes, consistent with feedback from CPA members, that the labour cost for undertaking reporting and confirmation of volumes is about $46 per hour. All dollar values are measured at 2012 price levels. Over a 10-year horizon beginning in 2017, and discounted at a rate of 7%, the present value of the total decrease in administrative cost is estimated to be $5,441 per business, and $446,200 for all businesses. The annualized administrative cost decrease, discounted to a base year of 2012, is estimated to be $45,295, and the annualized administrative cost decrease per business, $552. Small business lens The small business lens does not apply to the by-law amending By-law No. 2, as there are no costs to small business. Consultation The CPA has consulted with its membership through various Board-level and management advisory committees. In addition, the membership was consulted on the By-law No. 2 amendments through a consultation document. Minimal feedback was received on the consultation document. The comments and concerns that were received were summarized and addressed in a follow-up communication, which was provided to all members. Development of the new By-law No. 2 also included a review of funding models used by organizations similar to the CPA in Canada and other jurisdictions. Rationale The CPA’s current funding mechanism is set out in CPA By-law No. 2, which was last updated in 2003. Under the current By-law No. 2, dues are imposed on members on the basis of direct ACSS and LVTS operating costs and indirect costs (overhead). ACSS dues are allocated to all members based on the percentage share of ACSS payment items (sent and received) cleared through the ACSS in the preceding year. LVTS dues are allocated to LVTS participants based on percentage share of the total volume of LVTS payments (sent and received) processed through LVTS the preceding year. Indirect dues are allocated to all members based on each member’s percentage share of the total combined LVTS and ACSS dues. Members assessed less than $10,000 for indirect dues pay $10,000 in total dues (i.e. do not pay any ACSS or LVTS dues). The current $10,000 threshold, which applies to over 80% of CPA members, was established when operating costs and projected infrastructure investments were much lower. It was originally established to cover approximately 7% of the CPA’s total budget. With increased costs for operations and enhanced services that benefit all members, including risk management, security, compliance, research, education, and improved policies and rules, operating costs and investment are higher while the $10,000 threshold, or “base price”, has remained the same. As a result, the majority of members are now funding only approximately 3% of the costs to operate the CPA. Some of the challenges and constraints posed by the current by-law include the following: dues are based on the previous year’s volumes, which fail to account for in-year volume fluctuations relative to other members; volume-based dues may not result in an equitable distribution of costs for new developments; the current approach can result in significant variations in dues from year to year, especially where there are larger capital investments, which can be challenging for members to manage and plan for over time; members who do not clear directly through the ACSS self-report their volumes, information which is not verifiable and could lead to inaccurate assessments of dues. The current By-law No. 2 is inflexible and focused on the short term. It no longer aligns costs with value received and is insufficient to support the future direction of the CPA. The new By-law No. 2 would enable the CPA to build and maintain operations in the usual course of business and supplement the funding of significant new initiatives in furtherance of the CPA’s legislative mandate and a modernized Canadian payments system. Implementation, enforcement and service standards In accordance with subsection 18(2) of the Canadian Payments Act, by-law changes require approval by the Minister of Finance to come into force. Following ministerial approval, the by-law must be sent to all CPA members by the President of the CPA. The CPA is responsible for ensuring that its members comply with the by-laws, as applicable. The repeal and replacement of By-law No. 2 do not require any new mechanisms to ensure compliance and enforcement. Contact Deborah Wilson Senior Legal Counsel and Principal, Legal and Regulatory Affairs Canadian Payments Association Constitution Square, Tower II 350 Albert Street, Suite 800 Ottawa, Ontario K1R 1A4 Email: [email protected] PROPOSED REGULATORY TEXT Notice is given that the Board of Directors of the Canadian Payments Association, pursuant to subsection 18(1) (see footnote a) of the Canadian Payments Act (see footnote b), proposes to make the annexed Canadian Payments Association By-law No. 2 — Finance. Interested persons may make representations with respect to the proposed By-law within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. All such representations must cite the Canada Gazette, Part I, and the date of publication of this notice, and be addressed to Hugues Vaillancourt, Chief, Payments Policy, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance, 90 Elgin Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G5 (tel.: 613-369-4123; fax: 613-369-3894; email: [email protected]). Ottawa, August 2, 2016 Eileen Mercier Chairperson of the Board of Directors of the Canadian Payments Association Canadian Payments Association By-law No. 2 — Finance Interpretation Definitions 1 The following definitions apply in this By-law. amalgamated member means a member formed by the amalgamation or merger of members or of members and non-members. (membre fusionné) common services costs means the costs incurred by the Association to provide services for the benefit of all members and participants, including management services — such as services in relation to human resources, accounting or finances — the development and revision of policies and rules and research services provided in collaboration with members and stakeholders. (coût des services communs) common services dues means the dues determined under subsection 5(1). (cotisation pour services communs) direct operating costs mean the costs incurred by the Association to operate a system. (frais d’exploitation directs) participant means a participant as defined in section 1 of the By-law No. 7 Respecting the Large Value Transfer System, a direct clearer or group clearer as defined in section 1 of the Canadian Payments Association By-law No. 3 — Payment Items and Automated Clearing Settlement System or a party to any other system. (participant) service fees means the fees that are referred to in section 7. (droits de service) system means the Automated Clearing Settlement System as defined in section 1 of the Canadian Payments Association By-law No. 3 — Payment Items and Automated Clearing Settlement System, the Large Value Transfer System as defined in section 1 of the By-law No. 7 Respecting the Large Value Transfer System or any other clearing and settlement system, payment system or system or arrangement established or operated by the Association. (système) transaction fees means the fees that are referred to in subsection 6(1). (droits de transaction) Budgets Common services dues and transaction fees 2 (1) The Board must calculate common services dues and transaction fees for a fiscal year on the basis of the Association’s operating budget and capital expenditures budget for the fiscal year that the Board prepares under subsection 22(1) of the Canadian Payments Act. Contents of budgets (2) For the purpose of determining the common services dues and transaction fees payable for a fiscal year, the operating budget and capital expenditures budget for the fiscal year must specify common services costs and direct operating costs. Reserves (3) The Board, in establishing the operating budget and capital expenditures budget for a fiscal year, may include amounts for reserves in the Association’s costs. Changes to budgets 3 (1) If the Board makes a significant amendment to the operating budget or capital expenditures budget for a fiscal year, it must adjust the common services dues and transaction fees payable for the fiscal year on the basis of that amendment. Notice of adjustment (2) The Board must provide notice to members and participants at least 60 days before making an adjustment to common service dues and transaction fees under subsection (1). New and Amalgamated Members First year of membership 4 (1) A new member, other than an amalgamated member, must, in respect of its first year of membership, pay the full amount of the common services dues for the fiscal year in which it became a member. Amalgamated member (2) An amalgamated member formed in a fiscal year must pay the common services dues, transaction fees and service fees for the fiscal year in an amount that is the sum of all the combined unpaid common services dues, transaction fees and service fees of the members and non-members that were amalgamated or merged. Change of name (3) For greater certainty, a member that changes its name, other than as part of a merger or amalgamation, is not a new member. Common Services Dues Determination of amount 5 (1) For each fiscal year, each member must pay dues in respect of the common services costs, in an amount determined in accordance with the formula A/B where A is the amount estimated to be the costs, for the Association, of providing the services that are of equal benefit to all of the members, as determined by the Board in the previous fiscal year; and B is the estimated number of members on the first day of the fiscal year, as determined by the Board in the previous fiscal year. Timeline and notice (2) The Board must, no later than the day that is eight months before the first day of a fiscal year, (a) determine the common services dues payable for the fiscal year under subsection (1); and (b) inform members of the amount of those dues and explain how they were determined. Surplus (3) If, after the end of a fiscal year, the total amount of common services dues collected is greater than the actual costs, for the Association, of providing the services that are of equal benefit to all of the members, the Board may allocate the surplus to a research and development reserve fund, subject to a maximum amount established for the fiscal year by the Board. Fees for Services Transaction Fees Fees payable for each transaction 6 (1) Each participant in a system must pay a fee in respect of each of its transactions in the system. Determination of transaction fees (2) For each fiscal year, the Board must determine the transaction fees for each system on the basis of the estimated costs, for the Association, to operate that system and one of, or both of, the following: (a) the estimated number of all transactions by all participants in that system; (b) the estimated value of those transactions. Considerations — determination of transaction fees (3) The Board, in deciding whether to select paragraph (2)(a) or (b), or both, must consider, in respect of a particular system, the nature of the system, the number of participants and the number and value of transactions by each participant. Costs of operating system (4) The Board’s estimate of a system’s operating costs under subsection (2) must take into account, among other things, (a) the direct operating costs; (b) the portion of common services costs not included in the determination of the common services dues or in the determination of transactions fees for other systems; (c) the recovery of capital investment in the system; and (d) a fee-stabilizing charge to be held in reserve, subject to a maximum amount established for the fiscal year by the Board. Fee-stabilizing charge (5) In paragraph (4)(d), fee-stabilizing charge means a charge intended to account for minor variations between the estimates referred to in subsection (2) of a system’s operating costs and of the number and value of transactions and the actual values of those items. Timeline and notice (6) The Board must, no later than the day that is eight months before the first day of a fiscal year, (a) determine the transaction fees payable for the fiscal year under subsection (2); and (b) inform participants of the amount of those fees and explain how they were determined. Adjustment of transaction fees (7) If a participant withdraws from participation in a system in a fiscal year, and the President determines that reserves or surplus for the fiscal year are not sufficient to make up for any resulting loss in transaction fees, the President must adjust the transaction fees payable for the fiscal year. Notice of adjustment (8) The President must provide notice to participants at least 15 days before making an adjustment to transaction fees under subsection (7). Service Fees Determination of service fees 7 The fees — other than transaction fees — to be paid for services performed by or on behalf of the Association for the benefit of a member, participant or other person must be the costs, for the Association, of providing the services. Termination of Membership or Participation Reimbursement and unpaid dues or fees 8 A member that ceases to be a member or a participant that withdraws from participation in a system (a) is not entitled to a reimbursement of any common services dues, transaction fees or service fees that have been paid; and (b) continues to be liable for unpaid amounts of those dues and fees. Payment of Dues or Fees Common services dues 9 (1) Common services dues are payable by a member on or before the first day of each fiscal year or, if another date is established by the Board under subsection (3), by that date. Transaction fees (2) Transactions fees are payable by a participant for each preceding three-month period, within 15 days after an invoice is issued or, if another date is established by the Board under subsection (3), by that date. Other dates (3) For the purposes of operational efficiency, the Board may establish dates on which common services dues or transaction fees are payable other than those mentioned in subsection (1) or (2). Non-payment of Dues or Fees Interest on unpaid dues and fees 10 (1) In addition to any other action that may be taken under another by-law, a member, participant or other person that fails to pay common services dues, transaction fees or service fees on or before the day on which they are due must pay interest, at a rate of not more than 0.125% of the amount payable for each day that the payment is overdue, calculated in accordance with the method set out in a resolution of the Board. General revenue (2) The amount of any interest paid under this By-law accrues to the general revenue of the Association. Transitional Provision Common services dues and transaction fees — determination and notice 11 Subsections 2(2), 5(2) and 6(6) do not apply in respect of the fiscal year that begins on January 1, 2017. Repeal 12 The Canadian Payments Association By-Law No. 2 — Finance (see footnote 1) is repealed. Coming into Force January 1, 2017 13 This By-law comes into force on January 1, 2017. [36-1-o] Footnote a S.C. 2014, c. 39, ss. 342(1) to (4) Footnote b R.S., c. C-21; S.C. 2001, c. 9, s. 218 Footnote 1 SOR/2003-175
This Bill does not amend any statutes.
Sign up for alerts on this Bill
Receive emails tracking this Bill's progress.
See all your alerts in a dashboard.
Set an alert with one click and you're done!